This block + 6,000 more — yours with Pro

Comments Nested Threads

60/100
Docs

Discussion Thread

Deep nested conversations

AT
Alice Thompson1h ago

The recursive implementation is elegant but might hit stack overflow with deeply nested data. Has anyone benchmarked this?

BM
Bob Martinez45m agoL1

Good point. I tested with 10,000 nodes and it started throwing errors around depth 5000.

CL
Carol Lee30m agoL2

You could use a trampolined version to avoid stack overflow. Here's a snippet that converts recursion to iteration.

DK
David Kim20m agoL3

Nice! Though for React components, I'd recommend keeping depth under 100 for performance reasons.

ER
Eve Rodriguez10m agoL4

Agreed. We implemented a depth limit of 50 with a 'continue thread' button for deeper discussions.

FW
Frank Wilson25m agoL2

I wonder if virtualization would help here. Only render visible nodes in the tree?

GP
Grace Park40m agoL1

For production use, I'd go with iteration + explicit stack. More verbose but predictable.

HC
Henry Chen2h ago

The TypeScript types for this are interesting. Anyone have a good recursive type definition?

IP
Iris Patel1h 30m agoL1

type Comment = { id: string; content: string; replies: Comment[] } should work. The key is the self-referencing replies array.